[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOSpxda1RjgBDN5mKwj8SQ5iVx-SYRMtD32-7_AO5kEwK0-acg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:13:39 -1000
From: Steve Sakoman <steve@...oman.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Steinmetz <ast@...dv.de>,
Eric C Gallimore <egallimore@...d.edu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
Hi Greg,
I sent the patch you requested to fix use of the "unused" struct
member in samsung.c. If that looks OK to you I'll redo my
"serial:serial_core: Allow use of CTS for PPS line discipline" patch.
Thanks,
Steve
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:00 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:34:31AM -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > Interesting indeed. Who would have thought someone would be using the
> > "unused" padding variable!
>
> Ugh :(
>
> > How would folks prefer we fix this, in the referenced patch or by
> > eliminating the use of "unused" in samsung.c?
>
> We should just get rid of the "unused" fields entirely. They aren't
> needed here as this is not a structure that anyone really cares about.
> We can move things around a bit if the padding is an issue.
>
> I've reverted this patch first for now. I suggest a patch to the uart
> core to drop the unused fields and fix up the samsung driver and then
> your patch can go on top of that. Can you work on this?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists