linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] amdgpu/gmc : fix compile warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181004185237.GA20667@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:37 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
Cc:     alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
        David1.Zhou@....com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  amdgpu/gmc : fix compile warning

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 06:05:52PM +0800, Peng Hao wrote:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c:
>     In function ‘gmc_v8_0_process_interrupt’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c:1447:10:
>     warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>

Was there any feedback on this patch ? The problem does affect us,
and we'll need a fix.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
> index 9333109..55f4755 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
> @@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  		gmc_v8_0_set_fault_enable_default(adev, false);
>  
>  	if (printk_ratelimit()) {
> -		struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { 0 };
> +		struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { {0} };
>  

I wondered if
		struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { };
would be better.

Thanks,
Guenter

>  		amdgpu_vm_get_task_info(adev, entry->pasid, &task_info);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> index 72f8018..e8b78c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (printk_ratelimit()) {
> -		struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { 0 };
> +		struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { {0} };
>  
>  		amdgpu_vm_get_task_info(adev, entry->pasid, &task_info);
>