[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181004043812.GA8134@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:38:12 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com, fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] misc: cxl: delete possible null pointer dereference
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:56:48AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> It is safe to dereference an object below a NULL test. For the sake
> of debugging. Just delete the call of possible null pointer dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
> index 3bc0c15..472e8db 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ int cxl_guest_init_afu(struct cxl *adapter, int slice, struct device_node *afu_n
>
> void cxl_guest_remove_afu(struct cxl_afu *afu)
> {
> - pr_devel("in %s - AFU(%d)\n", __func__, afu->slice);
> + pr_devel("in %s\n", __func__);
This call should just be deleted, it's not needed, ftrace can be used
instead.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists