[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181005.144243.1971242720262167660.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: quentin.schulz@...tlin.com
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
antoine.tenart@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] net: phy: mscc: add support for VSC8584 and
VSC8574 Microsemi quad-port PHYs
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:17:05 +0200
> I suggest patches 1 to 3 go through net tree and patches 4 and 5 go
> through MIPS tree. Patches going through net tree and those going through
> MIPS tree do not depend on one another.
Sounds like a good plan but patches 1-3 do not apply to net-next, please
respin.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists