linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] x86: refcount: prevent gcc distortions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181005125241.GA4671@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:52:41 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] x86: refcount: prevent gcc distortions


* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:31:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Are you using defconfig or a reasonable distro-config for your tests?
> > > 
> > > I think it is best to take the kernel and run localyesconfig for testing.
> > 
> > Ok, agreed - and this makes the numbers you provided pretty representative.
> > 
> > Good - now that all of my concerns were addressed I'd like to merge the remaining 3 patches as 
> > well - but they are conflicting with ongoing x86 work in tip:x86/core. The extable conflict is 
> > trivial, the jump-label conflict a bit more involved.
> 
> FWIW, gcc guys are not too averse to the idea of enhancing gcc inline
> asm syntax with a statement which specifies its size so that gcc can use
> it to do better inlining cost estimation than counting lines.
> 
> Lemme work the process ...

Thanks!

	Ingo