[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFprMFWxRbx-fpo9M4J_Q=z8kZNqMsna-FjR54cyBYE96A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:54:12 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: tifm_sd: Mark expected switch fall-through
On 5 October 2018 at 11:54, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the
> "deliberate fall-through" comment with a proper "fall through"
> at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373887 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c
> index a3d8380..b6644ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c
> @@ -336,7 +336,8 @@ static unsigned int tifm_sd_op_flags(struct mmc_command *cmd)
> rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_R0;
> break;
> case MMC_RSP_R1B:
> - rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_BUSY; // deliberate fall-through
> + rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_BUSY;
> + /* fall-through */
> case MMC_RSP_R1:
> rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_R1;
> break;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists