linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 03/11] regulator: core: Mutually resolve regulators coupling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181005153638.1886-4-digetx@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri,  5 Oct 2018 18:36:30 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 03/11] regulator: core: Mutually resolve regulators coupling

If registered regulator found a couple, then the couple can find the
registered regulator too and hence coupling can be mutually resolved
at the registration time.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 54 +++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 5105eaaf3cef..925df9e6f1e3 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -4439,7 +4439,7 @@ static int regulator_register_resolve_supply(struct device *dev, void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int regulator_fill_coupling_array(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+static void regulator_resolve_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc;
 	int n_coupled = c_desc->n_coupled;
@@ -4453,33 +4453,21 @@ static int regulator_fill_coupling_array(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 
 		c_rdev = of_parse_coupled_regulator(rdev, i - 1);
 
-		if (c_rdev) {
-			c_desc->coupled_rdevs[i] = c_rdev;
-			c_desc->n_resolved++;
-		}
-	}
-
-	if (rdev->coupling_desc.n_resolved < n_coupled)
-		return -1;
-	else
-		return 0;
-}
+		if (!c_rdev)
+			continue;
 
-static int regulator_register_fill_coupling_array(struct device *dev,
-						  void *data)
-{
-	struct regulator_dev *rdev = dev_to_rdev(dev);
+		regulator_lock(c_rdev);
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
-		return 0;
+		c_desc->coupled_rdevs[i] = c_rdev;
+		c_desc->n_resolved++;
 
-	if (regulator_fill_coupling_array(rdev))
-		rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve coupling\n");
+		regulator_unlock(c_rdev);
 
-	return 0;
+		regulator_resolve_coupling(c_rdev);
+	}
 }
 
-static int regulator_resolve_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+static int regulator_init_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	int n_phandles;
 
@@ -4519,13 +4507,6 @@ static int regulator_resolve_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	if (!of_check_coupling_data(rdev))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	/*
-	 * After everything has been checked, try to fill rdevs array
-	 * with pointers to regulators parsed from device tree. If some
-	 * regulators are not registered yet, retry in late init call
-	 */
-	regulator_fill_coupling_array(rdev);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -4662,11 +4643,8 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto wash;
 
-	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
-	ret = regulator_resolve_coupling(rdev);
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
-
-	if (ret != 0)
+	ret = regulator_init_coupling(rdev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto wash;
 
 	/* add consumers devices */
@@ -4700,6 +4678,11 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 
 	rdev_init_debugfs(rdev);
 
+	/* try to resolve regulators coupling since a new one was registered */
+	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
+	regulator_resolve_coupling(rdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
+
 	/* try to resolve regulators supply since a new one was registered */
 	class_for_each_device(&regulator_class, NULL, NULL,
 			      regulator_register_resolve_supply);
@@ -5155,9 +5138,6 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
 	class_for_each_device(&regulator_class, NULL, NULL,
 			      regulator_late_cleanup);
 
-	class_for_each_device(&regulator_class, NULL, NULL,
-			      regulator_register_fill_coupling_array);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 late_initcall_sync(regulator_init_complete);
-- 
2.19.0