linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] arch/x86: Introduce QOS feature for AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:20:46 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
Cc:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "reinette.chatre@...el.com" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
        "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
        "colin.king@...onical.com" <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        "Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "jroedel@...e.de" <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "dima@...sta.com" <dima@...sta.com>,
        "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] arch/x86: Introduce QOS feature for AMD

Hi Babu,

On 24/09/18 20:19, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Enables QOS feature on AMD.
> Following QoS sub-features are supported in AMD if the underlying
> hardware supports it.
>  - L3 Cache allocation enforcement
>  - L3 Cache occupancy monitoring
>  - L3 Code-Data Prioritization support
>  - Memory Bandwidth Enforcement(Allocation)
> 
> There are differences in the way some of the features are implemented.
> Separate those functions and add those as vendor specific functions.
> The major difference is in MBA feature.
>  - AMD uses CPUID leaf 0x80000020 to initialize the MBA features.
>  - AMD uses direct bandwidth value instead of delay based on bandwidth
>    values.
>  - MSR register base addresses are different for MBA.

>  - Also AMD allows non-contiguous L3 cache bit masks.

Nice!

This is visible to user-space, the 'Cache Bit Masks (CBM)' section of
Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt currently says 'X86 hardware requires ... a
contiguous block'.

Does user-space need to know it can do this in advance, or is it a try-it-and-see?

Arm's MPAM stuff can do this too, but I'm against having the ABI vary between
architectures. If this is going to be discoverable, I'd like it to work on Arm too.


Thanks,

James

> Adds following functions to take care of the differences.
> rdt_get_mem_config_amd : MBA initialization function
> parse_bw_amd : Bandwidth parsing
> mba_wrmsr_amd: Writes bandwidth value
> cbm_validate_amd : L3 cache bitmask validation

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> index 5a282b6c4bd7..1e4631f88696 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -123,6 +169,41 @@ bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check whether a cache bit mask is valid. AMD allows
> + * non-contiguous masks.
> + */
> +bool cbm_validate_amd(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> +	unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
> +	unsigned int cbm_len = r->cache.cbm_len;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("non-hex character in mask %s\n", buf);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (val == 0 || val > r->default_ctrl) {
> +		rdt_last_cmd_puts("mask out of range\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	first_bit = find_first_bit(&val, cbm_len);
> +	zero_bit = find_next_zero_bit(&val, cbm_len, first_bit);
> +
> +
> +	if ((zero_bit - first_bit) < r->cache.min_cbm_bits) {
> +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("Need at least %d bits in mask\n",
> +				    r->cache.min_cbm_bits);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	*data = val;
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  struct rdt_cbm_parse_data {
>  	struct rdtgroup		*rdtgrp;
>  	char			*buf;
>