lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:07:25 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Grant Likely <glikely@...retlab.ca>,
        Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...aro.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/36] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Atmel board/soc bindings
 to json-schema

Hello,

On 05/10/2018 11:58:31-0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f788315b94fa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: None
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Atmel AT91 device tree bindings.
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> +  - Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>

Jean-Christophe has not been active for years, I'd mention Ludovic
instead.

> +description: |
> +  Boards with a SoC of the Atmel AT91 or SMART family shall have the following
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    const: '/'
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: atmel,at91rm9200
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - olimex,sam9-l9260
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91sam9260
> +              - atmel,at91sam9261
> +              - atmel,at91sam9263
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g20
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g45
> +              - atmel,at91sam9n12
> +              - atmel,at91sam9rl
> +              - atmel,at91sam9xe
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9
> +
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g15
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g25
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g35
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x25
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x35
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9x5
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9
> +
> +      - items:
> +          - const: atmel,sama5d27
> +          - const: atmel,sama5d2
> +          - const: atmel,sama5
> +
> +      - description: Nattis v2 board with Natte v2 power board
> +        items:
> +          - const: axentia,nattis-2
> +          - const: axentia,natte-2
> +          - const: axentia,linea

Shouldn't we have the board specific compatibles in a separate file to
avoid mixing everything with the SoC compatibles?


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ