linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Fix for movable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <166980d0-03fc-382b-84a9-a7431dae1580@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:02:43 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...il.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: Fix for movable_node boot option

I have not reviewed them yet. I am waiting for Masayoshi to send a new
series with correct order as Ingo requested.

Pavel

On 10/2/18 10:01 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 27-09-18 22:41:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
>>
>>> This patch series are the fix for movable_node boot option
>>> issue which was introduced by commit 124049decbb1 ("x86/e820:
>>> put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved").
>>>
>>> First patch, revert the commit. Second and third patch fix the
>>> original issue.
>>
>> Can the mm folks please comment on this?
> 
> I was under impression that Pavel who authored the original change which
> got reverted here has reviewed these patches.
>