| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:35:38 -0700 From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> To: ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes We've had several threads discussing potential changes to the code of conduct but Mauro is the only person to have proposed an actual patch. In order to move the debate on, I'm presenting two patches, one to fix the email problem Mauro identified and the other to strip the enforcement section pending community discussion as Shuah suggested. I'll take responsibility for collecting any tags people want to add (review/ack/sign off, etc) and sending the patch in as a signed pull request before 4.19 final if they get enough community support. Note, I've sent both patches in as a series to facilitate review and discussion, but they are separable if one is looked on with less favour than the other. It was also a bit unclear which list to send this to, but I finally settled on linux-kernel as the catch all and ksummit-discuss since that's where most of the current discussion is. I can add other lists as people suggest them. James --- James Bottomley (2): code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 17 +---------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists