linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 28/28] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9ocfZuoXYxyw2q7f_Lo1yQOw1Y43LeexmS6BJAgeaST3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Oct 2018 18:55:25 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 28/28] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

Hi Andrew,

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:48 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> Hi Jason
>
> This is the sort of thing you should state in the patchset version
> history. It is O.K. to say i will address this later, but you need to
> communicate that. Otherwise reviewers just get frustrated that
> comments are getting repeatedly ignored and why should they bother
> reviewing it. And without reviewers willing to review your code, it
> will never get into mainline.

Understood. Sorry about that.

Jason