linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/cpufeature: Add facility to match microcode revisions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 7 Oct 2018 07:32:50 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:     peterz@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        eranian@...gle.com, kan.liang@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/cpufeature: Add facility to match microcode
 revisions

On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Match specific microcodes or steppings.
> > 
> > What means microcodes or steppings? If you mean microcode revisions then
> > please spell it out and use it all over the place. steppings is confusing
> > at best as its associated to the CPU stepping.
> 
> The matcher can be used to match specific hardware steppings by setting
> the min/max_ucode to 0 or specific microcode revisions 
> (which are associated with steppings)

I can see your point, but calling x86_match_ucode() to match the stepping
of a CPU is really not intuitive. Can we please have functions and data
structures which have a clear purpose and are not overloaded in obscure
ways?

Thanks,

	tglx