lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun,  7 Oct 2018 03:03:38 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to recover inode->i_flags of inode block during POR

From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

Testcase to reproduce this bug:
1. mkfs.f2fs /dev/sdd
2. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
3. touch /mnt/f2fs/file
4. sync
5. chattr +a /mnt/f2fs/file
6. xfs_io -a /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fsync"
7. godown /mnt/f2fs
8. umount /mnt/f2fs
9. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
10. xfs_io /mnt/f2fs/file

There is no error when opening this file w/o O_APPEND, but actually,
we expect the correct result should be:

/mnt/f2fs/file: Operation not permitted

The root cause is, in recover_inode(), we recover inode->i_flags more
than F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags, so fix it.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index af66d6f5683b..eeee3756c3a9 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ static int recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 
 	F2FS_I(inode)->i_advise = raw->i_advise;
 	F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags = le32_to_cpu(raw->i_flags);
+	f2fs_set_inode_flags(inode);
 	F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_failures[GC_FAILURE_PIN] =
 				le16_to_cpu(raw->i_gc_failures);
 
-- 
2.18.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists