[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74ABB71C-6B0C-44AE-BC30-1F385ADC3E42@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 09:07:52 +0100
From: Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>
To: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>,
Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
CC: adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
georgi.djakov@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
venkatg@...eaurora.org, jeremymc@...hat.com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, riteshh@...eaurora.org,
dianders@...gle.com, sayalil@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Changes for SDCC5 version
Any updates on this?
On 25 September 2018 16:39:33 BST, Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 25 September 2018 12:17:26 BST, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
><vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>>On 9/25/2018 1:18 AM, Craig Tatlor wrote:
>>> What socs have you tested this on?
>>> On sdm660 it seems to crash device
>>> when writing pwr ctl.
>>
>>Hi
>>We have tested this on SDM845.
>>SDM660 also has SDCC5 controller, so you would need to define
>>"qcom,sdhci-msm-v5" in your platform dt.
>>Can you confirm if you have defined this?
>>
>Hi,
>Yes my DT entry is as follows
>
>sdhc_1: sdhci@...24900 {
>
>compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
>
>reg = <0xc0c4000 0x1000>, <0xc0c5000 0x1000>;
>
>interrupts = <GIC_SPI 112 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>
>interrupt-names = "pwr_irq";
>
>
>bus-width = <8>;
>
>non-removable;
>
>
>vmmc-supply = <&pm660l_l4>;
>
>vqmmc-supply = <&pm660_l8>;
>
>
>pinctrl-names = "default";
>
>pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_clk &sdc1_cmd &sdc1_data &sdc1_rclk>;
>
>
>clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
>
>clock-names = "core", "iface";
>
> };
>
>>BTW, can you please share few details of the platform that you are
>>checking?
>>We are not aware of any dev platform based on SDM660. This is just for
>
>>my info
>
>I'm checking on the sony xperia xa2 (pioneer) smartphone.
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:09:17AM +0530, Vijay Viswanath wrote:
>>>> With SDCC5, the MCI register space got removed and the offset/order
>>of
>>>> several registers have changed. Based on SDCC version used and the
>>register,
>>>> we need to pick the base address and offset.
>>>>
>>>> Depends on patch series: "[PATCH V5 0/2] mmc: sdhci-msm:
>Configuring
>>IO_PAD support for sdhci-msm"
>>>>
>>>> Changes since RFC:
>>>> Dropped voltage regulator changes in sdhci-msm
>>>> Split the "Register changes for sdcc V5" patch
>>>> Instead of checking mci removal for deciding which base addr to
>>use,
>>>> new function pointers are defined for the 2 variants of sdcc:
>>>> 1) MCI present
>>>> 2) V5 (mci removed)
>>>> Instead of string comparing with the compatible string from DT
>>file,
>>>> the sdhci_msm_probe will now pick the data associated with the
>>>> compatible entry and use it to load variant specific address
>>offsets
>>>> and msm variant specific read/write ops.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since V1:
>>>> Removed unused msm_reab & msm_writeb APIs
>>>> Changed certain register addresses from uppercase to lowercase hex
>>>> letters
>>>> Removed extra lines and spaces
>>>> Split "[PATCH V1 0/3] Changes for SDCC5 version" patch into two,
>>>> one for Documentation and other for the driver changes.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since V2:
>>>> Used lower case for macro function defenitions
>>>> Removed unused function pointers for msm_readb & msm_writeb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sayali Lokhande (3):
>>>> mmc: sdhci-msm: Define new Register address map
>>>> Documentation: sdhci-msm: Add new compatible string for SDCC v5
>>>> mmc: host: Register changes for sdcc V5
>>>>
>>>> Vijay Viswanath (1):
>>>> mmc: sdhci-msm: Add msm version specific ops and data structures
>>>>
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 7 +-
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 511
>>++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> 2 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
>>Center, Inc.
>>>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>a
>>Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>linux-arm-msm" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Veera
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists