lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74ABB71C-6B0C-44AE-BC30-1F385ADC3E42@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 07 Oct 2018 09:07:52 +0100
From:   Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>
To:     Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>,
        Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
CC:     adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        georgi.djakov@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
        venkatg@...eaurora.org, jeremymc@...hat.com,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, riteshh@...eaurora.org,
        dianders@...gle.com, sayalil@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] Changes for SDCC5 version

Any updates on this?

On 25 September 2018 16:39:33 BST, Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 25 September 2018 12:17:26 BST, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
><vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>>On 9/25/2018 1:18 AM, Craig Tatlor wrote:
>>> What socs have you tested this on?
>>> On sdm660 it seems to crash device
>>> when writing pwr ctl.
>>
>>Hi
>>We have tested this on SDM845.
>>SDM660 also has SDCC5 controller, so you would need to define
>>"qcom,sdhci-msm-v5" in your platform dt.
>>Can you confirm if you have defined this?
>>
>Hi,
>Yes my DT entry is as follows
>
>sdhc_1: sdhci@...24900 {                                               
>                  
>compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";                                      
>          
>reg = <0xc0c4000 0x1000>, <0xc0c5000 0x1000>;                          
>          
>interrupts = <GIC_SPI 112 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;                        
>          
>interrupt-names = "pwr_irq";                                           
>          
>                                                                       
>bus-width = <8>;                                                       
>          
>non-removable;                                                         
>          
>                                                                       
>vmmc-supply = <&pm660l_l4>;                                            
>          
>vqmmc-supply = <&pm660_l8>;                                            
>          
>                                                                       
>pinctrl-names = "default";                                             
>          
>pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_clk &sdc1_cmd &sdc1_data &sdc1_rclk>;               
>          
>                                                                       
>clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;          
>          
>clock-names = "core", "iface";                                         
>          
>        };          
>
>>BTW, can you please share few details of the platform that you are
>>checking?
>>We are not aware of any dev platform based on SDM660. This is just for
>
>>my info
>
>I'm checking on the sony xperia xa2 (pioneer) smartphone.
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:09:17AM +0530, Vijay Viswanath wrote:
>>>> With SDCC5, the MCI register space got removed and the offset/order
>>of
>>>> several registers have changed. Based on SDCC version used and the
>>register,
>>>> we need to pick the base address and offset.
>>>>
>>>> Depends on patch series: "[PATCH V5 0/2] mmc: sdhci-msm:
>Configuring
>>IO_PAD support for sdhci-msm"
>>>>
>>>> Changes since RFC:
>>>> 	Dropped voltage regulator changes in sdhci-msm
>>>> 	Split the "Register changes for sdcc V5" patch
>>>> 	Instead of checking mci removal for deciding which base addr to
>>use,
>>>> 	new function pointers are defined for the 2 variants of sdcc:
>>>> 		1) MCI present
>>>> 		2) V5 (mci removed)
>>>> 	Instead of string comparing with the compatible string from DT
>>file,
>>>> 	the sdhci_msm_probe will now pick the data associated with the
>>>> 	compatible entry and use it to load variant specific address
>>offsets
>>>> 	and msm variant specific read/write ops.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since V1:
>>>> 	Removed unused msm_reab & msm_writeb APIs
>>>> 	Changed certain register addresses from uppercase to lowercase hex
>>>> 	letters
>>>> 	Removed extra lines and spaces
>>>> 	Split "[PATCH V1 0/3] Changes for SDCC5 version" patch into two,
>>>> 	one for Documentation and other for the driver changes.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since V2:
>>>> 	Used lower case for macro function defenitions
>>>> 	Removed unused function pointers for msm_readb & msm_writeb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sayali Lokhande (3):
>>>>    mmc: sdhci-msm: Define new Register address map
>>>>    Documentation: sdhci-msm: Add new compatible string for SDCC v5
>>>>    mmc: host: Register changes for sdcc V5
>>>>
>>>> Vijay Viswanath (1):
>>>>    mmc: sdhci-msm: Add msm version specific ops and data structures
>>>>
>>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt          |   7 +-
>>>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c                       | 511
>>++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>   2 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>>   Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
>>Center, Inc.
>>>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>a
>>Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>linux-arm-msm" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Veera

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ