[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181008175622.029416852@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:30:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 052/168] bpf: avoid misuse of psock when TCP_ULP_BPF collides with another ULP
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 597222f72a94118f593e4f32bf58ae7e049a0df1 ]
Currently we check sk_user_data is non NULL to determine if the sk
exists in a map. However, this is not sufficient to ensure the psock
or the ULP ops are not in use by another user, such as kcm or TLS. To
avoid this when adding a sock to a map also verify it is of the
correct ULP type. Additionally, when releasing a psock verify that
it is the TCP_ULP_BPF type before releasing the ULP. The error case
where we abort an update due to ULP collision can cause this error
path.
For example,
__sock_map_ctx_update_elem()
[...]
err = tcp_set_ulp_id(sock, TCP_ULP_BPF) <- collides with TLS
if (err) <- so err out here
goto out_free
[...]
out_free:
smap_release_sock() <- calling tcp_cleanup_ulp releases the
TLS ULP incorrectly.
Fixes: 2f857d04601a ("bpf: sockmap, remove STRPARSER map_flags and add multi-map support")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
@@ -1465,10 +1465,16 @@ static void smap_destroy_psock(struct rc
schedule_work(&psock->gc_work);
}
+static bool psock_is_smap_sk(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ulp_ops == &bpf_tcp_ulp_ops;
+}
+
static void smap_release_sock(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sock *sock)
{
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&psock->refcnt)) {
- tcp_cleanup_ulp(sock);
+ if (psock_is_smap_sk(sock))
+ tcp_cleanup_ulp(sock);
write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
@@ -1895,6 +1901,10 @@ static int __sock_map_ctx_update_elem(st
* doesn't update user data.
*/
if (psock) {
+ if (!psock_is_smap_sk(sock)) {
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_progs;
+ }
if (READ_ONCE(psock->bpf_parse) && parse) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto out_progs;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists