[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181008210904.9362-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:09:04 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Stefan BrĂ¼ns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: ina2xx: fix missing break statement
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE case is missing a break statement and in
the unlikely event that chan->address is not matched in the nested
switch statement then the code falls through to the following
IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN case. Fix this by adding the missing
break. While we are fixing this, it's probably a good idea to
add in a break statement to the IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN case
too (this is a moot point).
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462408 ("Missing break in switch")
Fixes: ca6a2d86acae ("iio: adc: ina2xx: Allow setting Shunt Voltage PGA gain and Bus Voltage range")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
index d1239624187d..9bc5986780b9 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
*val2 = chip->shunt_resistor_uohm;
return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
}
+ break;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
switch (chan->address) {
@@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
*val = chip->range_vbus == 32 ? 1 : 2;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
}
+ break;
}
return -EINVAL;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists