lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:03:58 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fix up nowarn confusion in the dma mapping layer

Any comments on these rather trivial patches?

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 01:12:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series sorts out how we deal with the nowarn flags in the dma
> mapping code.  We still support __GFP_NOWARN for the legacy APIs that
> don't support passing the dma specific flags, but we generally want
> every implementation to actually check DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN instead.
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
---end quoted text---

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ