lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:13:16 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the
 compiler-attributes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/compiler-gcc.h

between commits:

  5c67a52f3da0 ("Compiler Attributes: always use the extra-underscores syntax")
  a3f8a30f3f00 ("Compiler Attributes: use feature checks instead of version checks")

from the compiler-attributes tree and commit:

  65bdf3bbf56e ("compiler: introduce __no_sanitize_address_or_inline")

from the s390 tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is
now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
index cfac027e1625,997ade08a79d..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
@@@ -147,7 -201,27 +147,14 @@@
  #define KASAN_ABI_VERSION 3
  #endif
  
 -#if GCC_VERSION >= 40902
 -/*
 - * Tell the compiler that address safety instrumentation (KASAN)
 - * should not be applied to that function.
 - * Conflicts with inlining: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
 - */
 -#define __no_sanitize_address __attribute__((no_sanitize_address))
 -#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
++#if (GCC_VERSION >= 40902) && defined(CONFIG_KASAN)
+ #define __no_sanitize_address_or_inline					\
+ 	__no_sanitize_address __maybe_unused notrace
+ #else
+ #define __no_sanitize_address_or_inline inline
+ #endif
 -#endif
+ 
  #if GCC_VERSION >= 50100
 -/*
 - * Mark structures as requiring designated initializers.
 - * https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Designated-Inits.html
 - */
 -#define __designated_init __attribute__((designated_init))
  #define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1
  #endif
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ