[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181008101828.hb4xtppbexwalbkk@flea>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 12:18:28 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc: wens@...e.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, architt@...eaurora.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/29] drm/sun4i: Rename DE2 registers related macros
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> In preparation to introduce DE3 support, change prefix from "SUN8I_" to
> "DE2_". Current prefix suggest that it's valid only for one family,
> whereas in reality, DE2 unit is used also on sun50i family.
> Additionally, it will be easier to distinguish DE3 specific macros by
> using "DE3_" prefix.
>
> No functional change in this commit.
I'm not too sure about this one. There's basically two ways to look at
this: you described the first one, and the second one would be to
treat it as we do for the compatibles: the IP was introduced on one
SoC family, and then got used on some other ones.
Trying to always match the one you have however have a quite big
maintainance cost, as can be shown by your patch: you always have to
adapt comments, function names, defines, etc. This creates a lot of
useless churns (ie, non-functional changes) in the drivers, that need
to be written in the first place, and then reviewed.
It's just not worth it.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists