linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181008104009.2x6s7shxfhl3hzkr@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:10:09 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        amit.kucheria@...aro.org, evgreen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW
 driver

On 08-10-18, 12:38, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:29:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 08-10-18, 10:40, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > > +		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "qcom,freq-domain",
> > > > +				"#freq-domain-cells", 0, &args);
> > > 
> > > Hello Taniya,
> > > 
> > > in your DT binding, you use
> > > 
> > > #freq-domains-cells = <1>
> > > 
> > > Yet here you parse for "#freq-domain-cells".
> > 
> > And what is the problem with that ? Or are you suggesting her to call
> > of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args() ?
> 
> Hello Viresh,
> 
> #freq-domain-cells != #freq-domains-cells
> 
> The code should parse for the exact same property name as stated in the
> DT binding.

Oh, I missed that both the names are different here. It makes sense
now :)

-- 
viresh