[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4016811d-74ac-fffc-7dc9-1c7acaf228be@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:47:13 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/3]: perf record: extend trace writing to multi AIO
Hi,
On 08.10.2018 13:55, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:19:17AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
<SNIP>
>> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
>> + if (!strcmp(var, "record.aio-cblocks"))
>> + rec->opts.nr_cblocks = strtol(value, NULL, 0);
>> +#endif
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -1837,6 +1864,10 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
>> "signal"),
>> OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "dry-run", &dry_run,
>> "Parse options then exit"),
>> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
>> + OPT_INTEGER(0, "aio-cblocks", &record.opts.nr_cblocks,
>> + "Max number of simultaneous per-mmap trace writes (default: 0 - serial, max: 4)"),
>> +#endif
>
> could you please move the option to enable that to the previou patch?
> so we could test the simple variant as well
Ok.
>
> also I think it'd be better if we have simple '--aio' option that would
> enable this with some default values.. and add --aio-cblocks to configure
> that further
Well, absence of --aio option, on the command line or in .perfconfig, or --aio=0
means serial writing.
>From this perspective perf record --aio --aio-cblocks=N looks like a complication.
Thanks,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists