[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJu0AGH7VizWJJVB2UnFhWKwMVTm-EznOfhDVabgQUA_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 08:30:38 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Grant Likely <glikely@...retlab.ca>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...aro.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/36] dt-bindings: arm: Convert FSL board/soc bindings to json-schema
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:02 AM Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:58:34AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Convert Freescale SoC bindings to DT schema format using json-schema.
> > +properties:
> > + $nodename:
> > + const: '/'
> > + compatible:
> > + oneOf:
> > + - description: i.MX23 based Boards
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - fsl,imx23-evk
> > + - olimex,imx23-olinuxino
> > + - const: fsl,imx23
> > +
> > + - description: i.MX25 Product Development Kit
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - fsl,imx25-pdk
> > + - const: fsl,imx25
> > +
> > + - description: i.MX27 Product Development Kit
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - fsl,imx27-pdk
> > + - const: fsl,imx27
> > +
> > + - description: i.MX28 based Boards
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - fsl,imx28-evk
> > + - i2se,duckbill
> > + - i2se,duckbill-2
> > + - technologic,imx28-ts4600
> > + - const: fsl,imx28
> > + - items:
>
> The schema is new to me. This line looks unusual to me, so you may want
> to double check.
It's fine. There's just no description schema on this one as it's a
continuation of the previous one (logically, but not from a schema
perspective). Perhaps add "i.MX28 I2SE Duckbill 2 based boards".
> > + - enum:
> > + - i2se,duckbill-2-485
> > + - i2se,duckbill-2-enocean
> > + - i2se,duckbill-2-spi
> > + - const: i2se,duckbill-2
> > + - const: fsl,imx28
> > +
> > + - description: i.MX51 Babbage Board
Powered by blists - more mailing lists