[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181008135611.otj53psegxtd3hcq@bars>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:56:21 +0000
From: Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich.os@...ntenna.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
CC: Cody Schuffelen <schuffelen@...gle.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] wireless-drivers: rtnetlink wifi simulation
device
> > Hi Cody,
> >
> >> drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig | 7 +
> >> drivers/net/wireless/Makefile | 2 +
> >> drivers/net/wireless/virt_wifi.c | 618 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 627 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/virt_wifi.c
> >
> > I did a quick check of your patch using checkpatch kernel tool,
> > here is a summary of its output:
> >
> > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict test.patch
> > ...
> > total: 165 errors, 428 warnings, 9 checks, 634 lines checked
> >
> > Most part of those complaints is about either whitespaces or code
> > idents. I am not sure whether this is a patch itself or email client.
> > So could you please take a look and run checkpatch on your side.
> >
>
> Yeah, it could be his email client, weird though because if I pull the
> patch from the kernel.org archive's mbox though, I don't get any
> errors except the MAINTAINERS file thing:
>
> wget https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181004195906.201895-1-schuffelen@google.com/raw
> -O /tmp/tmp.patch
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /tmp/tmp.patch
>
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #167:
> new file mode 100644
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 634 lines checked
Hi Cody and Joel,
Please ignore my comment regarding the whitespace issues in the patch.
I don't see those issues when downloading the patch via gmail server.
So the issue was on my side.
Regards,
Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists