linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] printk: Give error on attempt to set log buffer length to over 4G

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181008145950.GA1473@tigerII.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 23:59:50 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     zhe.he@...driver.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] printk: Give error on attempt to set log buffer
 length to over 4G

On (10/08/18 15:59), Petr Mladek wrote:
> I tried this patch with log_buf_len=5G. The kernel did not crash
> but dmesg shown some mess. There are several 32-bit variables
> to store the size, for example:
> 
> static u32 log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> u32 log_buf_len_get(void)
> static u32 log_first_idx;
> static u32 log_next_idx;
> 
> I guess that the code somewhere does not detect an overflows
> correctly.
> 
> I am not motivated enought to add support for such huge message
> buffer. Therefore I suggest to limit it to 32G for now.

Yeah, I think we gonna have problems even with a 4G logbuf and a 32-bit
user-space doing syslog(int len).

I agree on the "not motivated enough" part ;)

	-ss