linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:48:38 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the tip tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drivers-x86 tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/platform/x86/intel_mid_powerbtn.c

between commit:

  f2c4db1bd807 ("x86/cpu: Sanitize FAM6_ATOM naming")

from the tip tree and commit:

  a8b60e484f3d ("platform/x86: intel_mid_powerbtn: Get rid of custom ICPU() macro")

from the drivers-x86 tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/platform/x86/intel_mid_powerbtn.c
index 5ad44204a9c3,a8c0fbb7f799..000000000000
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_mid_powerbtn.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_mid_powerbtn.c
@@@ -121,12 -112,9 +112,9 @@@ static const struct mid_pb_ddata mrfld_
  	.setup	= mrfld_setup,
  };
  
- #define ICPU(model, ddata)	\
- 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (kernel_ulong_t)&ddata }
- 
  static const struct x86_cpu_id mid_pb_cpu_ids[] = {
- 	ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SALTWELL_MID,		mfld_ddata),
- 	ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID,	mrfld_ddata),
 -	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_PENWELL,		mfld_ddata),
 -	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_MERRIFIELD,		mrfld_ddata),
++	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_SALTWELL_MID,	mfld_ddata),
++	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID,	mrfld_ddata),
  	{}
  };
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped