[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181008161847.GA30971@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:18:47 -0600
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>, poza@...eaurora.org,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] error handling and pciehp maintenance
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.busch@intel.com
>
> which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes the error
> injector dependent on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, which not all arches
> support. Note that this question is only about the error *injection*
> module used for testing. It doesn't affect AER support itself.]
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:11:37PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:40:15PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 05:58:36PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > I ran into a lot of trouble testing error handling, and this series is
> > > > just trying to simplify some things. The first 4 fix up aer_inject, and
> > > > the rest are cleanup to make better use of kernel APIs.
> > > >
> > > > Keith Busch (12):
> > > > PCI: Set PCI bus accessors to noinline
> > > > PCI/AER: Covertly inject errors
> > > > PCI/AER: Reuse existing service device lookup
> > > > PCI/AER: Abstract AER interrupt handling
> > > > PCI/AER: Remove dead code
> > > > PCI/AER: Remove error source from aer struct
> > > > PCI/AER: Use kfifo for tracking events
> > > > PCI/AER: Use kfifo helper inserting locked elements
> > > > PCI/AER: Don't read upstream ports below fatal errors
> > > > PCI/AER: Use threaded IRQ for bottom half
> > > > PCI/AER: Use managed resource allocations
> > > > PCI/pciehp: Use device managed allocations
> > > >
> > > > drivers/pci/access.c | 4 +-
> > > > drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 14 +-
> > > > drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 48 ++----
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 219 ++++++---------------------
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie/aer_inject.c | 306 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.h | 4 -
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 1 +
> > > > 8 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 371 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for doing this! I applied these to pci/hotplug for
> > > v4.20, except for "PCI/AER: Don't read upstream ports below fatal
> > > errors", which seems to be already there via another posting, and
> > > "PCI/pciehp: Use device managed allocations", which needs a few
> > > tweaks.
> >
> > Sounds good, and thanks for applying!
> >
> > In case this went unnoticed, patch 2's aer_inject using ftrace hooks
> > to pci config accessors is really cool and fixes several kernel crashes
> > I encountered, but it may not work on every architecture. I'm not sure
> > how widely aer_inject is used, so maybe there are no concerns with the
> > DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS dependency, but I just want to reemphasize that
> > dependency in case there are valid objections.
>
> Oh, indeed, I hadn't noticed this arch dependency. AFAICT, the new
> DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS dependency means aer_inject will work only
> on these arches:
>
> arm # if (!XIP_KERNEL) && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> powerpc # if PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> riscv # ARCH_RV64I only
> s390
> x86
>
> Notably missing is arm64, which has DYNAMIC_FTRACE but not
> DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS.
>
> Bjorn
Looks like the kbuild bot found an ARM kernel config that has
DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS set, and then the module can't compile
there. I'll need to update this patch regardless, and I think the right
thing to do is maintain the "old" way with conditional compiling for
any arch specific features.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists