[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9834f9b1-d997-4842-6dac-321c6ec85311@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:45:30 +0000
From: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
"colin.king@...onical.com" <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"jroedel@...e.de" <jroedel@...e.de>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"dima@...sta.com" <dima@...sta.com>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] arch/x86: Initialize the resource functions that
are different
On 10/09/2018 12:18 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/5/2018 1:55 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
>> index 812cc5c5e39e..ee3e8389d8d2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static bool bw_validate(char *buf, unsigned long *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -int parse_bw(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
>> +int parse_bw_intel(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
>> struct rdt_domain *d)
>> {
>> unsigned long bw_val;
>>
>
> Just a small nit - could you please check that the alignment matches the
> open parenthesis as you have done with all the other similar changes in
> this patch?
Ok. Sure. will take care of it. Thanks.
>
> Reinette
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists