linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] media: imx.rst: Update doc to reflect fixes to interlaced capture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <539cd27c-5c7c-7ea9-af1b-143ac97f9a15@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:09:47 -0700
From:   Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] media: imx.rst: Update doc to reflect fixes to
 interlaced capture



On 10/05/2018 03:52 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 11:54 -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> <snip>
>> +or bottom-top or alternate, and the capture interface field type is set
>> +to interlaced (t-b, b-t, or unqualified interlaced). The capture interface
>> +will enforce the same field order if the source pad field type is seq-bt
>> +or seq-tb. However if the source pad's field type is alternate, any
>> +interlaced type at the capture interface will be accepted.
> This part is fine, though, as are the following changes. I'd just like
> to avoid giving the wrong impression that the CSI does line interweaving
> or pixel reordering into the output pixel format.

Agreed, I made the wording more clear.

Steve