[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-4de1a293a08bdf8ec1530e02163930ac86f80ea2@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:21:48 -0700
From: tip-bot for Lance Roy <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.ibm.com, ldr709@...il.com, dvhart@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] futex: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
Commit-ID: 4de1a293a08bdf8ec1530e02163930ac86f80ea2
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4de1a293a08bdf8ec1530e02163930ac86f80ea2
Author: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:57 -0700
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:19:28 +0200
futex: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited for checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when the lock is held by some other task. This
is also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003053902.6910-12-ldr709@gmail.com
---
kernel/futex.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 11fc3bb456d6..3e2de8fc1891 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1365,9 +1365,9 @@ static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q)
{
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
- if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr))
- || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)))
+ if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr) || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)))
return;
+ lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr);
hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock);
plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists