linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: thp: relax __GFP_THISNODE for MADV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 16:25:10 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:     David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrea Argangeli <andrea@...nel.org>,
        Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>,
        Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable tree <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: thp:  relax __GFP_THISNODE for MADV_HUGEPAGE
 mappings

On Tue 09-10-18 14:00:34, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 02:27:45PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [Sorry for being slow in responding but I was mostly offline last few
> >  days]
> > 
> > On Tue 09-10-18 10:48:25, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > [...]
> > > This goes back to my point that the MADV_HUGEPAGE hint should not make
> > > promises about locality and that introducing MADV_LOCAL for specialised
> > > libraries may be more appropriate with the initial semantic being how it
> > > treats MADV_HUGEPAGE regions.
> > 
> > I agree with your other points and not going to repeat them. I am not
> > sure madvise s the best API for the purpose though. We are talking about
> > memory policy here and there is an existing api for that so I would
> > _prefer_ to reuse it for this purpose.
> > 
> 
> I flip-flopped on that one in my head multiple times on the basis of
> how strict it should be. Memory policies tend to be black or white --
> bind here, interleave there, etc. It wasn't clear to me what the best
> policy would be to describe "allocate local as best as you can but allow
> fallbacks if necessary".

I was thinking about MPOL_NODE_PROXIMITY with the following semantic:
- try hard to allocate from a local or very close numa node(s) even when
that requires expensive operations like the memory reclaim/compaction
before falling back to other more distant numa nodes.


> Hence, I started leaning towards advise as it is
> really about advice that the kernel can ignore if necessary. That said,
> I don't feel as strongly about the "how" as I do about the fact that
> applications and libraries should not depend on side-effects of the
> MADV_HUGEPAGE implementation that relate to locality.

completely agreed on this.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs