[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181009160327.GE9259@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:03:27 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>, poza@...eaurora.org,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] error handling and pciehp maintenance
Hi Bjorn,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.busch@intel.com
>
> which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes the error
> injector dependent on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, which not all arches
> support. Note that this question is only about the error *injection*
> module used for testing. It doesn't affect AER support itself.]
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:11:37PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > In case this went unnoticed, patch 2's aer_inject using ftrace hooks
> > to pci config accessors is really cool and fixes several kernel crashes
> > I encountered, but it may not work on every architecture. I'm not sure
> > how widely aer_inject is used, so maybe there are no concerns with the
> > DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS dependency, but I just want to reemphasize that
> > dependency in case there are valid objections.
>
> Oh, indeed, I hadn't noticed this arch dependency. AFAICT, the new
> DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS dependency means aer_inject will work only
> on these arches:
>
> arm # if (!XIP_KERNEL) && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> powerpc # if PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> riscv # ARCH_RV64I only
> s390
> x86
>
> Notably missing is arm64, which has DYNAMIC_FTRACE but not
> DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS.
Thanks for the heads-up here. This feature is currently in development for
arm64:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181001141648.1DBED68BDF@newverein.lst.de
but the latest review comments suggest that it's a fair way from ready yet,
so I wouldn't hold your breath.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists