linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/168] 4.18.13-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181009160836.GB8426@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:08:36 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/168] 4.18.13-stable review

On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:18:28PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Andre Tomt wrote:
> > > On 09. okt. 2018 11:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:21:31AM +0200, Andre Tomt wrote:
> > > > > On 08. okt. 2018 20:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.13 release.
> > > > > > There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > >    CC [M]  net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.o
> > > > > net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c:373:3: error: ‘const struct
> > > > > nf_conntrack_l4proto’ has no member named ‘ctnl_timeout’; did you mean
> > > > > ‘get_timeouts’?
> > > > >    .ctnl_timeout  = {
> > > > >     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > >     get_timeouts
> > > > > 
> > > > > The problematic patch is:> netfilter-conntrack-timeout-interface-depend-on-config_nf_conntrack_timeout.patch
> > > > > 
> > > > > The stuff the commit message talks about seems like it was added in
> > > > > 4.19-rc1, so this should not go into stable.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Kernel builds fine with this one patch reverted.
> > > > 
> > > > So you have CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_TIMEOUT enabled but not
> > > > CONFIG_NF_NETLINK_TIMEOUT?  Looks like we just need to modify the .h
> > > > file to fix this up properly, right?
> > > 
> > > Adding Pablo to the thread as I dont know
> > > 
> > > > This isn't showing up in my build tests as that configuration seems a
> > > > bit odd to me.
> > > 
> > > I think you meant CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT instead of
> > > CONFIG_NF_NETLINK_TIMEOUT?
> > > 
> > > This is the configuration:
> > > CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT=y
> > > # CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_TIMEOUT is not set
> > 
> > upstream commit a874752a10da113f513980e28f562d946d3f829d depends on:
> > 
> > commit 6c1fd7dc489d9bf64196f5b0fa33e059f64460c8
> > Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> > Date:   Tue Aug 7 17:14:15 2018 +0200
> > 
> >     netfilter: cttimeout: decouple timeout policy from nfnetlink_cttimeout object
> > 
> > So I would suggest to keep it back / not place it 4.18.x stable.
> 
> Hm, actually, a874752a10da113f513980e28f562d946d3f829 depends on:
> 
> commit ad83f2a9ce37a264202f48f4fd8889ee9056b703
> Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> Date:   Tue Aug 7 17:14:19 2018 +0200
> 
>     netfilter: remove ifdef around cttimeout in struct nf_conntrack_l4proto
> 
> Not the one I mentioned above.

Thanks for the info, I've now dropped this from both 4.14.y and 4.18.y.

greg k-h