linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-pil: Register segments/dumpfn for coredump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 09 Oct 2018 21:51:42 +0530
From:   Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ohad@...ery.com, kyan@...eaurora.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org,
        akdwived@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-pil: Register
 segments/dumpfn for coredump

Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the review !

On 2018-10-08 12:18, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 27 Jul 08:20 PDT 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> 
>> Register the MDT segments and custom dumpfn with the remoteproc core
>> dump functionality.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 40 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c 
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
>> index ac3342f9ea5a..22bb049c3e7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
>> @@ -1058,10 +1058,50 @@ static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc 
>> *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>>  	return qproc->mpss_region + offset;
>>  }
>> 
>> +static int qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
>> +				const struct firmware *fw_unused)
> 
> How about naming it mba_fw instead of unused? Just as unused, but 
> easier
> to understand why it isn't used.
> 

sure

>> +{
>> +	const struct firmware *fw;
>> +	const struct elf32_phdr *phdrs;
>> +	const struct elf32_phdr *phdr;
>> +	const struct elf32_hdr *ehdr;
>> +	struct q6v5 *qproc = (struct q6v5 *)rproc->priv;
> 
> No need for an explicit typecast from void *.
> 

will remove it

> The rest looks good!
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn

-- 
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.