[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c328b3c5-ef09-5cf7-80f5-4b6a8cc9a553@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:29:35 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/Kconfig.debug: add a comment to PROVE_LOCKING impact
On 10/09/2018 11:39 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> This patch add some comment related to performance impact,
> which can be really big (x3 times slower context switch).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 4966c4f..9e67a2a3 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1088,6 +1088,9 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
> the proof of observed correctness is also maintained for an
> arbitrary combination of these separate locking variants.
>
> + This feature enables LOCKDEP which can harm system performance
> + even x3 times.
> +
> For more details, see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt.
>
> config LOCK_STAT
> @@ -1112,6 +1115,10 @@ config LOCK_STAT
> CONFIG_LOCK_STAT defines "contended" and "acquired" lock events.
> (CONFIG_LOCKDEP defines "acquire" and "release" events.)
>
> + This feature enables LOCKDEP which can harm system performance
> + even x3 times.
> + For more details, see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt.
> +
> config DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
> bool "RT Mutex debugging, deadlock detection"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && RT_MUTEXES
> @@ -1175,6 +1182,10 @@ config DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> spin_lock_init()/mutex_init()/etc., or whether there is any lock
> held during task exit.
>
> + This feature enables LOCKDEP which can harm system performance
> + even x3 times.
> + For more details, see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt.
> +
> config LOCKDEP
> bool
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
I don't mind seeing warning message about the performance impact of
enabling lockdep. However, the actual slowdown depends on many factors
including the type of systems, workloads and so on. I am a bit hesitant
to quote an actual figure like x3 in the help text as it may not be
correct in many cases.
BTW, my recent lockdep patch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/2/1410)
should be able to reduce the performance impact of enabling lockdep.
Could you try to see if that help in your case?
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists