| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181009173037.32630-4-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 23:00:35 +0530
From: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, jforbes@...hat.com,
seth.forshee@...onical.com, pjones@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] ima: refactor ima_init_policy()
From: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
This patch removes the code duplication in ima_init_policy() by defining
a new function named add_rules(). The new function adds the rules to the
initial IMA policy, the custom policy or both based on the policy mask
(IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY, IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY).
Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 8c9499867c91..1e30d09a56db 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE,
enum policy_types { ORIGINAL_TCB = 1, DEFAULT_TCB };
+enum policy_rule_list { IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY = 1, IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY };
+
struct ima_rule_entry {
struct list_head list;
int action;
@@ -473,6 +475,32 @@ static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func)
return 0;
}
+static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
+ enum policy_rule_list policy_rule)
+{
+ int i = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
+
+ if (policy_rule & IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY)
+ list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &ima_default_rules);
+
+ if (policy_rule & IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY) {
+ entry = kmemdup(&entries[i], sizeof(*entry),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!entry)
+ continue;
+
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
+ }
+ if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
+ temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
+ if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
+ temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* ima_init_policy - initialize the default measure rules.
*
@@ -481,28 +509,23 @@ static int ima_appraise_flag(enum ima_hooks func)
*/
void __init ima_init_policy(void)
{
- int i, measure_entries, appraise_entries, secure_boot_entries;
-
- /* if !ima_policy set entries = 0 so we load NO default rules */
- measure_entries = ima_policy ? ARRAY_SIZE(dont_measure_rules) : 0;
- appraise_entries = ima_use_appraise_tcb ?
- ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules) : 0;
- secure_boot_entries = ima_use_secure_boot ?
- ARRAY_SIZE(secure_boot_rules) : 0;
+ int build_appraise_entries;
- for (i = 0; i < measure_entries; i++)
- list_add_tail(&dont_measure_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules);
+ /* if !ima_policy, we load NO default rules */
+ if (ima_policy)
+ add_rules(dont_measure_rules, ARRAY_SIZE(dont_measure_rules),
+ IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
switch (ima_policy) {
case ORIGINAL_TCB:
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(original_measurement_rules); i++)
- list_add_tail(&original_measurement_rules[i].list,
- &ima_default_rules);
+ add_rules(original_measurement_rules,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(original_measurement_rules),
+ IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
break;
case DEFAULT_TCB:
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules); i++)
- list_add_tail(&default_measurement_rules[i].list,
- &ima_default_rules);
+ add_rules(default_measurement_rules,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules),
+ IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
default:
break;
}
@@ -511,38 +534,30 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
* Insert the builtin "secure_boot" policy rules requiring file
* signatures, prior to any other appraise rules.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) {
- list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules);
- temp_ima_appraise |=
- ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func);
- }
+ if (ima_use_secure_boot)
+ add_rules(secure_boot_rules, ARRAY_SIZE(secure_boot_rules),
+ IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
/*
* Insert the build time appraise rules requiring file signatures
* for both the initial and custom policies, prior to other appraise
- * rules.
+ * rules. As the secure boot rules includes all of the build time
+ * rules, include either one or the other set of rules, but not both.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); i++) {
- struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
-
- if (!secure_boot_entries)
- list_add_tail(&build_appraise_rules[i].list,
- &ima_default_rules);
-
- entry = kmemdup(&build_appraise_rules[i], sizeof(*entry),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (entry)
- list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
- build_ima_appraise |=
- ima_appraise_flag(build_appraise_rules[i].func);
+ build_appraise_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules);
+ if (build_appraise_entries) {
+ if (ima_use_secure_boot)
+ add_rules(build_appraise_rules, build_appraise_entries,
+ IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY);
+ else
+ add_rules(build_appraise_rules, build_appraise_entries,
+ IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY | IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY);
}
- for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) {
- list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list,
- &ima_default_rules);
- if (default_appraise_rules[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
- }
+ if (ima_use_appraise_tcb)
+ add_rules(default_appraise_rules,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules),
+ IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
ima_rules = &ima_default_rules;
ima_update_policy_flag();
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists