[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 03:28:54 +0000
From: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"haibo.chen@...escale.com" <haibo.chen@...escale.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Subject: RE: Pinmuxing and SDHC speeds on sdhci-esdhc-imx
Hi Adam
Yes, MMC_DDR52 can use pins_100mhz. You can do that, thanks!
Best Regards
Bough Chen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-mmc-owner@...r.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-mmc-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Adam Ford
> Sent: 2018年10月9日 21:38
> To: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>;
> haibo.chen@...escale.com; Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
> Subject: Pinmuxing and SDHC speeds on sdhci-esdhc-imx
>
> I have a question regarding the pinstate and the corresponding uhs_signaling.
>
> The uhs_signaling shows a variety of timing options,
>
> MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR12, MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25:,
> MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50, MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104,
> MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200, MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50,
> MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400, and
> MMC_TIMING_LEGACY
>
> However the esdhc_change_pinstate function only lists
> MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50, MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50,
> MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200, and
> MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS40, and a defaut.
>
> From what I can tell, this means that MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52 uses the
> default pinmux. I am wondering if it should use pins_100mhz. We have an
> eMMC part that we want to operate at this point and it seems like it missing.
> If so, I can submit a patch.
>
> It also seems like that SDR12, SDR25 use the default. I assume this is OK.
>
> adam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists