[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1539143546.2716467.1536750504.65ADF11A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:52:26 -0700
From: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...hon.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace beautify: Beautify flags of mount(2) and
umount(2).
Hi Arnaldo,
Did you get a chance to look at this again?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 14:50, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 11:28, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Benjamin Peterson escreveu:
> > > Example output of perf trace -e mount,umount2:
> > >
> > > 6243.930 ( 0.052 ms): mount/30976 mount(dev_name: 0x55dc541bb920, dir_name: 0x55dc541bc960, type: 0x55dc541b9c40, flags: BIND) = 0
> > > 7851.821 (26.015 ms): umount/30983 umount2(name: 0x558daa82cf50, flags: MNT_FORCE ) = 0
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...hon.org>
> >
> > So, I tried:
> >
> > Before your patch:
> >
> > # perf trace -e *mount* mount /dev/mapper/fedora-home /s
> > 0.000 ( 4.335 ms): mount/3126 mount(dev_name: 0x55deecc4d480,
> > dir_name: 0x55deecc4d4a0, type: 0x55deecc53880, flags: 3236757504) = 0
> > #
> > # perf trace -e *mount* umount /dev/mapper/fedora-home /s
> > ? ( ): umount/3138 ... [continued]: umount2()) = 0
> > 11.576 (umount: 0.004 ms): /s: not mounted.umount/
> > 3138 umount2(arg0: 94501956754656, arg1: 0, arg2: 1, arg3:
> > 140051050083104, arg4: 4, arg5: 94501956755136) = -1 EINVAL Invalid
> > argument
> > #
> >
> > After:
> >
> > [root@...et ~]# perf trace -e *mount* mount /dev/mapper/fedora-home /s
> > 0.000 ( 1.213 ms): mount/5244 mount(dev_name: 0x5558c1169480,
> > dir_name: 0x5558c11694a0, type: 0x5558c116f880, flags: ) = 0
> > [root@...et ~]# perf trace -e *mount* umount /s
> > 0.000 ( 9.241 ms): umount/5251 umount2(name:
> > 0x55f74a986480 ) = 0
> >
> > The flags for mount got empty? Can you pleaes check that? I.e. using the
> > default mount options, not specifying a 'bind' mount like you did.
>
> That comes from these lines in syscall_arg__scnprintf_mount_flags:
>
> if ((flags & MS_MGC_MSK) == MS_MGC_VAL)
> flags &= ~MS_MGC_MSK;
>
> The reason for this is explained in the comment for do_mount in fs/namespace.c:
>
> /*
> * Pre-0.97 versions of mount() didn't have a flags word.
> * When the flags word was introduced its top half was required
> * to have the magic value 0xC0ED, and this remained so until 2.4.0-test9.
> * Therefore, if this magic number is present, it carries no information
> * and must be discarded.
> */
>
> (I used a bind mount for my commit message example because a "default"
> mount() doesn't use any flags.)
>
> >
> > I'm splitting this patch so that the aliasing of 'umount2' to 'umount'
> > gets merged now,
> >
> > Check my perf/core branch at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git
>
> LGTM. Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists