lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:50:50 +0530
From:   "Raju P.L.S.S.S.N" <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>
To:     andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, khilman@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rnayak@...eaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org, ilina@...eaurora.org,
        Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Raju P.L.S.S.S.N" <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 3/8] timer: Export next wakeup time of a CPU

From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>

Knowing the sleep duration of CPUs, is known to be needed while selecting
the most energy efficient idle state for a CPU or a group of CPUs.

However, to be able to compute the sleep duration, we need to know at what
time the next expected wakeup is for the CPU. Therefore, let's export this
information via a new function, tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(). Following
changes make use of it.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
Co-developed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Raju P.L.S.S.S.N <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>
(am from https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10478021/)
---
 include/linux/tick.h     |  8 ++++++++
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 55388ab..e48f6b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
 extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(ktime_t *delta_next);
 extern unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls(void);
 extern unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls_cpu(int cpu);
+extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu);
 extern u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
 extern u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
 
@@ -151,6 +152,13 @@ static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(ktime_t *delta_next)
 	*delta_next = TICK_NSEC;
 	return *delta_next;
 }
+
+static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu)
+{
+	/* Next wake up is the tick period, assume it starts now */
+	return ktime_add(ktime_get(), TICK_NSEC);
+}
+
 static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
 static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
 
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 5b33e2f..bca95f9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -1089,6 +1089,16 @@ unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls(void)
 	return ts->idle_calls;
 }
 
+/**
+ * tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup - return the next wake up of the CPU
+ */
+ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu)
+{
+	struct clock_event_device *dev = per_cpu(tick_cpu_device.evtdev, cpu);
+
+	return dev->next_event;
+}
+
 static void tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(struct tick_sched *ts)
 {
 #ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ