linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (ina3221) Add operating mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:36:59 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     jdelvare@...e.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (ina3221) Add operating mode support

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:31:52PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> > One more question here, and this might sound a bit abuse of using
> > the existing hwmon ABI: would it sound plausible to you that the
> > driver powers down the chip when all three channels get disabled
> > via in[123]_enable nodes? :)
> > 
> 
> I would not call that an abuse, no.

Hmm..do you mean that you aren't in favor of powering down the chip
after all channels get disabled?

I was thinking about having pm_runtime_get_sync()/put() for channel
enabling/disabling routine of in[123]_enable.

Thanks
Nicolin