[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa19265c-f39a-cb7d-1215-1c663d15ac30@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:39:21 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Craig Milo Rogers <rogers@....edu>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Insanely high baud rates
On 10/11/18 12:36 PM, Craig Milo Rogers wrote:
> On 18.10.11, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>
> Solaris made the distinction between B0, which means pty hangup mode,
> and any other baud rate:
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37851/pty-4d.html
>
> But... why not implement a pty bandwidth limitation layer? You say, I
> need to justify it? It's for, uh... protecting the system from unrestricted
> pty usage DOS attacks! Yeah. That's what it's for.
B0 is hangup, that's not in question.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists