[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-7b6abce7e1e69b6d8dc5d40a8cb9ddaeb400427c@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:39:50 -0700
From: tip-bot for John Garry <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: john.garry@...wei.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/completions/Documentation: Fix a couple of
punctuation nits
Commit-ID: 7b6abce7e1e69b6d8dc5d40a8cb9ddaeb400427c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7b6abce7e1e69b6d8dc5d40a8cb9ddaeb400427c
Author: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:56:32 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:36:22 +0200
sched/completions/Documentation: Fix a couple of punctuation nits
This patch fixes a couple of punctuation nits which can make the document
more correct and readable.
Also missing "()" are added to some function references for consistency.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: corbet@....net
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1539183392-239389-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt
index 656cf803c006..108bd0f264b3 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ A typical usage scenario is:
This is not implying any temporal order on wait_for_completion() and the
call to complete() - if the call to complete() happened before the call
to wait_for_completion() then the waiting side simply will continue
-immediately as all dependencies are satisfied if not it will block until
+immediately as all dependencies are satisfied; if not, it will block until
completion is signaled by complete().
Note that wait_for_completion() is calling spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(),
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ wait_for_completion():
The default behavior is to wait without a timeout and to mark the task as
uninterruptible. wait_for_completion() and its variants are only safe
in process context (as they can sleep) but not in atomic context,
-interrupt context, with disabled irqs. or preemption is disabled - see also
+interrupt context, with disabled irqs, or preemption is disabled - see also
try_wait_for_completion() below for handling completion in atomic/interrupt
context.
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ queue spinlock. Any such concurrent calls to complete() or complete_all()
probably are a design bug.
Signaling completion from hard-irq context is fine as it will appropriately
-lock with spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore and it will never sleep.
+lock with spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() and it will never sleep.
try_wait_for_completion()/completion_done():
Powered by blists - more mailing lists