linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the kvm-arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:58:23 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the kvm-arm
 tree

On 11/10/2018 04:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:22:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   233a7cb23531 ("kvm: arm64: Allow tuning the physical address size for VM")
>>
>> from the kvm-arm tree and commit:
>>
>>   aa069a996951 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add a VM capability to enable nested virtualization")
>>
>> from the kvm-ppc tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index 95aa73ca65dc,7f2ff3a76995..000000000000
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@@ -962,7 -954,7 +963,8 @@@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt 
>>   #define KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE 157
>>   #define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 158
>>   #define KVM_CAP_MSR_PLATFORM_INFO 159
>>  -#define KVM_CAP_PPC_NESTED_HV 160
>>  +#define KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE 160 /* returns maximum IPA bits for a VM */
>> ++#define KVM_CAP_PPC_NESTED_HV 161
>>   
>>   #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>>   
> 
> This is now a conflict between the kvm tree and the kvm-arm tree.

Indeed, and ARM will be bumped to 161 (whoever comes first to the kvm
tree wins).

Paolo