linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: greybus: loopback.c: do insertion in O(n) instead of O(n lg n)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:11:34 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: greybus: loopback.c: do insertion in O(n)
 instead of O(n lg n)

On 2018-10-11 01:03, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 05/10/2018 15:28, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes<linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>> ---
>> I have no idea if the performance matters (it probably doesn't). Feel
>> free to ignore this and the followup cleanup.
> 
> What's the problem you're fixing here ?

No problem, really, other than my inner Paul Hogan telling me "That's
not an insertion sort, ...".

> Is it tested ?

Compile-tested. As I said, if the performance (and inaccurate comment)
is irrelevant, just drop it.

Rasmus