[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2578568d-e1b8-b7b5-beeb-ad485a971f2d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:01:57 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, skannan@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
evgreen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ
Firmware bindings
Hello Rob,
Thanks for your review comments.
On 9/27/2018 9:01 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 04:03:12PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Add QCOM cpufreq firmware device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's
>> SoCs. This is required for managing the cpu frequency transitions which are
>> controlled by the hardware engine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c06941c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
>> +Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. CPUFREQ Bindings
>> +
>> +CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by some Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI)
>> +SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
>> +for multiple clusters.
>> +
>> +Properties:
>> +- compatible
>> + Usage: required
>> + Value type: <string>
>> + Definition: must be "qcom,cpufreq-hw".
>> +
>> +- clocks
>> + Usage: required
>> + Value type: <phandle> From common clock binding.
>> + Definition: clock handle for XO clock and GPLL0 clock.
>> +
>> +- clock-names
>> + Usage: required
>> + Value type: <string> From common clock binding.
>> + Definition: must be "xo", "cpu_clk".
>> +
>> +- reg
>> + Usage: required
>> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>> + Definition: Addresses and sizes for the memory of the HW bases in
>> + each frequency domain.
>> +- reg-names
>> + Usage: Optional
>> + Value type: <string>
>> + Definition: Frequency domain name i.e.
>> + "freq-domain0", "freq-domain1".
>> +
>> +* Property qcom,freq-domain
>> +Devices supporting freq-domain must set their "qcom,freq-domain" property with
>> +phandle to a cpufreq_hw followed by the Domain ID(0/1) in the CPU DT node.
>> +
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +Example 1: Dual-cluster, Quad-core per cluster. CPUs within a cluster switch
>> +DCVS state together.
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + CPU0: cpu@0 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>> + L2_0: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + L3_0: l3-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU1: cpu@100 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x100>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_100>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>> + L2_100: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU2: cpu@200 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x200>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_200>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>> + L2_200: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU3: cpu@300 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x300>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_300>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
>> + L2_300: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU4: cpu@400 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x400>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_400>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>> + L2_400: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU5: cpu@500 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x500>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_500>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>> + L2_500: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU6: cpu@600 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x600>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_600>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>> + L2_600: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + CPU7: cpu@700 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo385";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x700>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_700>;
>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
>> + L2_700: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + cpufreq_hw: qcom,cpufreq-hw {
>
> Should have a unit-address and node names should be generic. We don't
> really have one for this, but let's go with 'cpufreq', so:
>
> cpufreq@...43000
>
Thanks Rob, will update in the next patch.
>> + compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw";
>> + reg = <0x17d43000 0x1400>, <0x17d45800 0x1400>;
>> + reg-names = "freq-domain0", "freq-domain1";
>> +
>> + clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, <&gcc GPLL0>;
>> + clock-names = "xo", "cpu_clk";
>> +
>> + #freq-domains-cells = <1>
>
> Not documented, but I don't think you need this if it is always 1 and
> because this is not a common binding.
>
I would add it in the next patch just to keep it documented.
> Rob
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists