| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFopGLrbKjqizs+BEX8pqhA0G62y5yGo92fBaRBzWaKpmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:06:42 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
seansw@....qualcomm.com, daidavid1@...eaurora.org,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
abailon@...libre.com, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mmc: host: sdhci-msm: Use the interconnect API
On 11 October 2018 at 14:03, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org> wrote:
> The interconnect API provides an interface for consumer drivers to express
> their bandwidth needs in the SoC. This data is aggregated and the on-chip
> interconnect hardware is configured to the appropriate power/performance
> profile.
>
> Use the interconnect API to get() the path between the endpoints used for
> data transfers by the SD host controller and report the needed bandwidth
> based on the clock rate, bus width and mode.
Overall, this makes sense to me!
>
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> This depends on the interconnect API: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/31/444
>
> TODO: Use macros for converting and rounding to icc units instead of
> converting between kilobits and kilobytes in the consumer drivers.
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 3cc8bfee6c18..8ca99ccdb035 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>
> @@ -258,6 +259,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
> bool mci_removed;
> const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops;
> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
> + struct icc_path *path;
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -1627,6 +1629,30 @@ static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_v5_var = {
> .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> };
>
> +static int sdhci_msm_icc_update(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(&msm_host->pdev->dev);
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> + struct mmc_ios *ios = &mmc->ios;
> + unsigned char bus_width = 1 << ios->bus_width;
> + u32 bw;
> +
> + /* calculate the needed bandwidth */
> + bw = host->clock;
According to my understanding of the code, host->clock doesn't
necessarily reflect the actual set clock rate. For example,
clk_set_rate() doesn't mean that requested rate is set exactly to the
requested rate.
Moreover, it may not be evident, but from mmc core perspective, it's
strongly recommended for mmc host drivers to set ->actual_clock to the
"actual clock rate" in the corresponding struct mmc_host. I suggest
sdhci-msm convert to that, in a first step. Once that is done, I would
rather move the below computations, to find the bandwidth, into a
helper function inside the mmc core.
> +
> + if (host->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 ||
> + host->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) {
> + bw *= 2;
> + }
> +
> + if (bus_width == 4)
> + bw /= 2;
> + else if (bus_width == 1)
> + bw /= 8;
> +
> + return icc_set(msm_host->path, 0, bw / 1000);
> +}
> +
> static const struct of_device_id sdhci_msm_dt_match[] = {
> {.compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4", .data = &sdhci_msm_mci_var},
> {.compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5", .data = &sdhci_msm_v5_var},
> @@ -1698,16 +1724,27 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> msm_host->saved_tuning_phase = INVALID_TUNING_PHASE;
>
> + msm_host->path = of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, "sdhc-mem");
> + if (IS_ERR(msm_host->path)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->path);
> + goto pltfm_free;
> + }
> + ret = sdhci_msm_icc_update(msm_host);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Interconnect setup failed (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto icc_disable;
> + }
> +
> /* Setup SDCC bus voter clock. */
> msm_host->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus");
> if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk)) {
> /* Vote for max. clk rate for max. performance */
> ret = clk_set_rate(msm_host->bus_clk, INT_MAX);
> if (ret)
> - goto pltfm_free;
> + goto icc_disable;
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(msm_host->bus_clk);
> if (ret)
> - goto pltfm_free;
> + goto icc_disable;
> }
>
> /* Setup main peripheral bus clock */
> @@ -1883,6 +1920,8 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> bus_clk_disable:
> if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk))
> clk_disable_unprepare(msm_host->bus_clk);
> +icc_disable:
> + icc_put(msm_host->path);
> pltfm_free:
> sdhci_pltfm_free(pdev);
> return ret;
> @@ -1902,6 +1941,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>
> + icc_put(msm_host->path);
> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
> msm_host->bulk_clks);
> if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk))
> @@ -1917,6 +1957,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>
> + icc_set(msm_host->path, 0, 0);
> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
> msm_host->bulk_clks);
>
> @@ -1929,6 +1970,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>
> + sdhci_msm_icc_update(msm_host);
> return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
> msm_host->bulk_clks);
> }
Besides the above, this makes sense to me.
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists