[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <073dedee-62df-9c67-1742-8de1e6c9502a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:17:57 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+6df4d24a0a50fd5d1a08@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: refcount bug in kvm_vm_ioctl
On 10/10/2018 09:58, syzbot wrote:
> do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:316
> invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:993
> RIP: 0010:refcount_inc_checked+0x5d/0x70 lib/refcount.c:153
> kvm_get_kvm arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:766 [inline]
> kvm_ioctl_create_device arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2924
> kvm_vm_ioctl+0xed7/0x1d40 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3114
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
> file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:501 [inline]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x1de/0x1720 fs/ioctl.c:685
> ksys_ioctl+0xa9/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:702
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:709 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:707 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:707
> do_syscall_64+0x1b9/0x820 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
The trace here is fairly simple, but I don't understand how this could
happen.
The kvm_get_kvm is done within kvm_ioctl_create_device, which is called
from ioctl; the last reference cannot disappear inside a ioctl, because:
1) kvm_ioctl is called from vfs_ioctl, which does fdget and holds the fd
reference until after kvm_vm_ioctl returns
2) the file descriptor holds one reference to the struct kvm*, and this
reference is not released until kvm_vm_release is called by the last
fput (which could be fdput's call to fput if the process has exited in
the meanwhile)
3) for completeness, in case anon_inode_getfd fails, put_unused_fd will
not invoke the file descriptor's ->release callback (in this case
kvm_device_release).
CCing some random people to get their opinion...
Paolo
> # See https://goo.gl/kgGztJ for information about syzkaller reproducers.
> #{"threaded":true,"collide":true,"repeat":true,"procs":6,"sandbox":"none","fault_call":-1,"tun":true,"tmpdir":true,"cgroups":true,"netdev":true,"resetnet":true,"segv":true}
> r0 = openat$kvm(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000380)='/dev/kvm\x00', 0x0, 0x0)
> r1 = syz_open_dev$dspn(&(0x7f0000000100)='/dev/dsp#\x00', 0x3fe, 0x400)
> r2 = ioctl$KVM_CREATE_VM(r0, 0xae01, 0x0)
> perf_event_open(&(0x7f0000000040)={0x1, 0x70, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x50d}, 0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0)
> mincore(&(0x7f0000ffc000/0x1000)=nil, 0x1000, &(0x7f00000003c0)=""/4096)
> setrlimit(0x0, &(0x7f0000000000))
> readahead(r1, 0x3, 0x9a6)
> ioctl$KVM_CREATE_DEVICE(r2, 0xc00caee0, &(0x7f00000002c0)={0x4})
> setsockopt$inet_sctp6_SCTP_FRAGMENT_INTERLEAVE(r1, 0x84, 0x12, &(0x7f00000001c0)=0x9, 0x4)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists