lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:16:30 -0400
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: make FB_BACKLIGHT a tristate

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:35 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/18, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> > BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE is already tristate, but a dependency
> > FB_BACKLIGHT prevents it from being built as a module.  There
> > doesn't seem to be any particularly good reason for this, so
> > switch FB_BACKLIGHT over to tristate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
>
> I don't see anything immediately wrong, but anything related to
> BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT
> and FB_BACKLIGHT is really fragile in Kconfig, because of the
> way those interact with other options.
>
> I've applied your patch to my randconfig build tree for testing,
> let's see what happens there before you apply it.
>

thanks.. tbh the fragility of backlight vs kconfig is why I've
procrastinated on fixing this for a while.. in the end the solution
seems not as bad as I feared (and after a iteration or two makes rhel
kernel builds for various archs happy, at least).. but defn some
randconfig build testing is in order.

PS. discovering that the thing you need to fix (a) never really worked
as intended, and (b) involves backlight + fbdev.. is never a good way
to start your day ;-)

BR,
-R

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ