lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181011111329.253f0689@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:13:29 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the mac80211-next
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the crypto tree got conflicts in:

  net/wireless/lib80211_crypt_tkip.c
  net/wireless/lib80211_crypt_wep.c

between commit:

  b802a5d6f345 ("lib80211: don't use skcipher")

from the mac80211-next tree and commit:

  db20f570e17a ("lib80211: Remove VLA usage of skcipher")

from the crypto tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the mac80211-next versions of these 2 files
for now) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ