linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:48:59 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
        linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, jani.nikula@...el.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback()

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:51 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:12 AM Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 05:07, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, that's what I'd linked to in the patchwork URL. Andrew, can you take this?
> >>
> >> clang built -next is blowing up now that Kees' -Wvla patch has been
> >> included. This patch fixes it.
> >>
> >> Kees, perhaps it should go in your tree along side of the -Wvla patch
> >> if no one else wants to take it?
> >>
> >
> > I can take it along in the compiler attributes tree, since that
> > touches the compiler*.h stuff. Although that would make it
> > not-only-attributes, i.e. slightly lying :-)
>
> Oh, I had assumed Masahiro was going to carry it.

No, I am not.

Putting all sort of things into kbuild basket
is painful for me.



> If that's not true,
> sure I'll pick it up as part of my VLA "series".


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada